Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC

Shelton, WA · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC runs at 439% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC: 16.7 TCR = 439% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC safety composite

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC: 26.9 → 89.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 89.5 TCR · DART/TCR 5.11× in 2022

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC's TCR rose 62.6 from 26.9 in 2017 to 89.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 5.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Shelton, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 439% of ind

  • DART 85.3 DART
  • RANK #185/216
  • PHOTO Vision Park
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vision Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shelton Assisted Living, LLC averages 16.7 TCR (439% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC TCR series: 2017=26.9 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=25.9 · 2022=89.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Shelton Assisted Living, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC (21 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Shelton Assisted Living, LLC
Shelton Assisted Living, LLC (21 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Shelton Assisted Living, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 89.5 85.3 2 19 0
2021 25.9 25.9 0 6 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2019 12.2 4.1 3 0 0
2018 14.1 14.1 3 0 0
2017 26.9 26.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Shelton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 36 employers in Shelton, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vision Park 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greentree at Mt. Vernon 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSL Smithtown Operations Inc 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABBY BURLESON LLC 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knutzen Farms LP 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Firewood 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pasco Farming 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE AB-Jacklin Seed-Liberty Lake 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Squaxin Island Gaming dba Little Creek Casino Resort 810 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mason General Hospital & Clinics 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mason General Hospital 556 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2121 342 FTE
NAT-TCR 355180-Medford Po 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR M-16 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Busti 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southbrook Healthcare Center 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bedrock Flint Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites Phoenix/Scottsdale 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pro-Prept. Inc. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.