Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Maryland

Sheraton Silver Spring

Silver Spring, MD · ~71 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheraton Silver Spring runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade D.

Sheraton Silver Spring: 4.7 TCR = 158% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheraton Silver Spring safety composite

Sheraton Silver Spring scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2017→2020

Sheraton Silver Spring injury rate improved

Sheraton Silver Spring's TCR fell 6.5 from 6.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.5 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/126
  • PHOTO JW Marriott Hotel
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JW Marriott Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Sheraton Silver Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheraton Silver Spring averages 4.7 TCR (158% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheraton Silver Spring TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sheraton Silver Spring falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 126 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Maryland.

Sheraton Silver Spring (71 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheraton Silver Spring
Sheraton Silver Spring (71 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Sheraton Silver Spring has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 3.5 3 0 0
2018 7.2 3.6 6 0 0
2017 6.5 4.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MD · Silver Spring

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JW Marriott Hotel 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aventura Mall Hilton Hotel 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westmark Fairbanks Hotel 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheraton Lakeside Chalet 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE HARBOR ROOFING and CONTRACTING INC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOEL's FIRE PROTECTION 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAN-AM CONTRACTORS, INC 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DOCCR-Community Offender Management 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MMC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Klaussner Plant 4/51 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE PuratosKenosha 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 70 - Home Care Oshkosh 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Production 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.