Farm machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro

Greensboro, NC · ~109 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Farm machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro: 4.4 TCR = 200% of Farm machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro safety composite

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro: 1.4 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro's TCR rose 1.7 from 1.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423820 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 200% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Heritage Tractor Pit…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Tractor Pittsburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro averages 4.4 TCR (200% of the Farm machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=11.1 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3 · BLS 2.2

Where Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro falls in its industry

700 Farm machinery and equipment m establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Farm machinery and equipment m employers in North Carolina.

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro (109 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro
Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro (109 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Sherrill, Inc. Greensboro has more employees than the Farm machinery and equipment merchant wh median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.3 4 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 5 0 0
2022 2.9 1.4 4 0 0
2021 6.2 4.5 7 0 0
2020 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2019 5.4 4.5 5 1 0
2018 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2017 11.1 8.3 8 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423820 · NC · Greensboro

700 Farm machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Tractor Pittsburg 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sharp 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 17 - Watsontown 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenn-Feld Group Napoleon 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Primoris T&D Services - Charlotte 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Graham 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid Atlantic Infrastructure Systems Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaines and company Inc 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR EnerSys Romeoville 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nikkel & Associates, Inc dba NAI Electrical Contractors 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR D. B. Cheerleaders, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR David M. Maines Associates, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Beverage Packaging, LLC - LaCrosse Plant 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Plant 4 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ground Effects, LLC - San Antonio 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE GMI Asphalt LLC 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.