Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed · Minnesota

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope

Saint Peter, MN · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed workplace, earning a grade B.

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope: 2.5 TCR = 65% of Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope safety composite

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Saint Peter, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/75
  • PHOTO Elev8 Center New Yor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elev8 Center New York LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope averages 2.5 TCR (65% of the Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope falls in its industry

1,165 Residential group homes for th establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 75 Residential group homes for th employers in Minnesota.

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope (62 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope
Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope (62 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Shiloh Acquisition LLC/ Shiloh's Hope has more employees than the Residential group homes for the emotiona median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MN · Saint Peter

1,165 Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 21 employers in Saint Peter, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elev8 Center New York LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birch 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4238-340 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Healthlink 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pipestone System Services 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sports Group 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueLinx Corporation Aitkin 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nor-Son Construction 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forensics 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alumacraft Boat Company 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR River's Edge Hospital and Clinic 185 FTE
NAT-TCR Applied Felts, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Overton Chicago Gear - Addison 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chris Mullins Co., LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunwest Electric Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE EE Marr Erectors Inc 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stokes Equipment Company 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Solutions Group 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartselle 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.