Partition, moveable and/or demountable, installation · Illinois

Sho-Link, Inc.

Westmont, IL · ~1,613 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sho-Link, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Partition, moveable and/or demountable, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Sho-Link, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Partition, moveable and/or demountable, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sho-Link, Inc. safety composite

Sho-Link, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Sho-Link, Inc. injury rate improved

Sho-Link, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238390 · Westmont, IL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/30
  • PHOTO Chamberlin Austin, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~1,613 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chamberlin Austin, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sho-Link, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sho-Link, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Partition, moveable and/or demountable, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sho-Link, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Sho-Link, Inc. falls in its industry

403 Partition, moveable and/or dem establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 30 Partition, moveable and/or dem employers in Illinois.

Sho-Link, Inc. (1,613 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sho-Link, Inc.
Sho-Link, Inc. (1,613 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Sho-Link, Inc. has more employees than the Partition, moveable and/or demountable, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 7 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238390 · IL · Westmont

403 Partition, moveable and/or demountable, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 95 employers in Westmont, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chamberlin Austin, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWR Ft. Bliss 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamberlin Dallas LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Closets Etc LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elmhurst , IL - 01 1,612 FTE
STATE-SIZE UChicago Medicine AdventHealth Hinsdale 1,615 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support 1,610 FTE
STATE-SIZE UnityPoint Health-Trinity 1,602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin City Staffing-MN 1,723 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Management 1,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Building Service Group 982 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pack Expo Services, LLC -1141 862 FTE
NAT-TCR Acoustimac LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Quincy Compressor, LLC (South Region) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OSHA Log LPC Crosswhite 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Reese Electric Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Txrth - Haslet Hub 1,613 FTE
NAT-SIZE Disney Vacation Club Hawaii Management Company, LLC, dba Aulani, A Disney Resort & Spa 1,613 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist South 1,613 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm Fresh Foods, LLC 1,612 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.