Facilities support services · Illinois

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support

Chicago, IL · ~1,610 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Facilities support services workplace, earning a grade C.

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Facilities support services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support safety composite

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support held a steady TCR band

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/46
  • PHOTO Pima County Superior…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~1,610 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Facilities support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support falls in its industry

757 Facilities support services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 46 Facilities support services employers in Illinois.

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support (1,610 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support
Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support (1,610 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Cushman and Wakefield GOS Operations Support has more employees than the Facilities support services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · IL · Chicago

757 Facilities support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1101 Home Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - Chicago IL 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - New York 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elmhurst , IL - 01 1,612 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sho-Link, Inc. 1,613 FTE
STATE-SIZE UChicago Medicine AdventHealth Hinsdale 1,615 FTE
STATE-SIZE UnityPoint Health-Trinity 1,602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nal Muscle Shoals Plant 1,610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ups Technology Headquarters & Datacenter (Njrar) 1,610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamson Medical Center 1,611 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm Fresh Foods, LLC 1,612 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.