Plastics foam products (except disposable) merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

Shrink Packaging Systems

Edison, NJ · ~63 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shrink Packaging Systems runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Plastics foam products (except disposable) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Shrink Packaging Systems: 0.4 TCR = 19% of Plastics foam products (except disposable) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shrink Packaging Systems safety composite

Shrink Packaging Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2020

Shrink Packaging Systems injury rate improved

Shrink Packaging Systems's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424990 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/17
  • PHOTO HQ
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Shrink Packaging Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shrink Packaging Systems averages 0.4 TCR (19% of the Plastics foam products (except disposable) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shrink Packaging Systems TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Shrink Packaging Systems falls in its industry

301 Plastics foam products (except establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 17 Plastics foam products (except employers in New Jersey.

Shrink Packaging Systems (63 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Shrink Packaging Systems
Shrink Packaging Systems (63 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Shrink Packaging Systems has fewer employees than the Plastics foam products (except disposabl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424990 · NJ · Edison

301 Plastics foam products (except disposable) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HQ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Manufacturing Company, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keefe Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern California Sales Office 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE VARIETY FARMS INC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE- Winslow Operations 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water- Fire Rd. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storm Master Gutters #846 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper Sumter Sheet Converting 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bolton & Menk - Maplewood 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller Bros. Const., Inc. - Industrial 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BASF - Geismar 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Global Underground Corp. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cl-3 Opened 10/22/13 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE LV 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE PT - Open 03/19/12 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.