Door units, prehung, wood and covered wood, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc.

North Huntingdon, PA · ~102 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Door units, prehung, wood and covered wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Door units, prehung, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. safety composite

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2022→2023

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. injury rate improved

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 3.7 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321911 · North Huntingdon, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/19
  • PHOTO Integrity Windows an…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Integrity Windows and Doors - Fargo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Door units, prehung, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. falls in its industry

452 Door units, prehung, wood and establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 19 Door units, prehung, wood and employers in Pennsylvania.

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc.
Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Shusters Builders Supplies, Inc. has more employees than the Door units, prehung, wood and covered wo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 3.7 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321911 · PA · North Huntingdon

452 Door units, prehung, wood and covered wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in North Huntingdon, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Integrity Windows and Doors - Fargo 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite Corp. - Northumberland 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clayton Windows 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ohio custom door 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano PA CPG - Agri-Kind 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKee Management Associates, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakers Pittsburgh 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Division 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5241 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5241 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2114 - North Huntingdon 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Grove At Irwin 180 FTE
NAT-TCR American Fuji Seal 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Community and Technical College 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bi-Rite Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - CA515 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warehouse : SAN BERNARDINO 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Precision Products - Euclid 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE MP Equipment LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10672 Toledo 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.