Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Texas

SI Environmental

Rosenberg, TX · ~200 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SI Environmental runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

SI Environmental: 2.5 TCR = 211% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SI Environmental safety composite

SI Environmental scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SI Environmental held a steady TCR band

SI Environmental's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Rosenberg, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 211% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO Jacobs TWIN FALLS OMI
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacobs TWIN FALLS OMI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SI Environmental in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SI Environmental averages 2.5 TCR (211% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SI Environmental TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3 · BLS 1.2

Where SI Environmental falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Texas.

SI Environmental (200 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SI Environmental
SI Environmental (200 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

SI Environmental has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 7 0 0
2023 3.6 3.3 11 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 6 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 5 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2018 2.3 1.4 5 0 0
2017 2.4 1.9 4 1 0
2016 3.4 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · TX · Rosenberg

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 68 employers in Rosenberg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacobs TWIN FALLS OMI 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County Sanitation District 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Quality Science Building 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northside Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1400 W LOOP 340, WACO CALL CTR (SS) 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE KIK Underground, LLC 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeldFit Services 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Ltd @ Tesla 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSENBERG PLANT 1,146 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC16 DC16 ROSENBERG TX 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-DC16 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosenberg 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson Contractor Group, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dauphin Precision Tool, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Arkell Hall Foundation, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Molded Fiber Glass Composite Systems Company 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 146-Sanibel Harbour Marriott Resort & Spa 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harmony House Care Center 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE 380-Bay Area (San Leandro) 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper Retail Packaging and Display - Thorofare 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.