Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing · California

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road

Sacramento, CA · ~2,300 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road safety composite

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road held a steady TCR band

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.1 in 2022 to 1.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO MEPPI110-116
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~2,300 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEPPI110-116 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road falls in its industry

208 Industrial locomotives and par establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Industrial locomotives and par employers in California.

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road (2,300 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road
Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road (2,300 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Siemens Mobility Rolling Stock French Road has more employees than the Industrial locomotives and parts manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.6 29 0 0
2022 1.1 0.5 22 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · CA · Sacramento

208 Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEPPI110-116 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMC Muncie IN Locomotive 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waskom TX Wheelshop 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grant Railway Services, Inc 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Penumbra, Inc. - Alameda Campus 2,299 FTE
STATE-SIZE 012 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - GREAT OAKS 2,302 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supermicro 2,295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rancho Nuevo Harvesting, Inc. 2,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Coated Products Division 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Optical Cable Corporation Asheville 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewiston Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Fastener Co., Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sanofi Sales 2,300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earth City (Moear) 2,300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park MGM Hotel and Casino 2,300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte 2,300 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.