Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Sienna at Otay Ranch

Chula Vista, CA · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sienna at Otay Ranch runs at 851% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sienna at Otay Ranch: 32.3 TCR = 851% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sienna at Otay Ranch safety composite

Sienna at Otay Ranch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sienna at Otay Ranch: 30.8 → 33.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 33.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2020

Sienna at Otay Ranch's TCR rose 3.1 from 30.8 in 2019 to 33.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 32.3 · 851% of ind

  • DART 23.2 DART
  • RANK #216/216
  • PHOTO Primrose Retirement …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City (2.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sienna at Otay Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sienna at Otay Ranch averages 32.3 TCR (851% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Sienna at Otay Ranch TCR series: 2019=30.8 · 2020=33.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Sienna at Otay Ranch falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sienna at Otay Ranch (98 employees, TCR 32.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Sienna at Otay Ranch
Sienna at Otay Ranch (98 employees, TCR 32.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Sienna at Otay Ranch has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 33.9 23.2 12 7 0
2019 30.8 24.3 16 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Chula Vista

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Edgewater 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Terrace 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weee Inc. Milpitas, CA (Logistics) 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seafood City Supermarket - South San Francisco 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devonshire Care Center LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0077 Fremont 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Manufacturing, LLC. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentucky One Health Office Park 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller Electric Construction, Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Battery Park 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.