Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · Alabama

SII Tuscaloosa

Tuscaloosa, AL · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SII Tuscaloosa runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

SII Tuscaloosa: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SII Tuscaloosa safety composite

SII Tuscaloosa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

SII Tuscaloosa injury rate improved

SII Tuscaloosa's TCR fell 0.7 from 4.1 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Tuscaloosa, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Niagara Refining LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Niagara Refining LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

SII Tuscaloosa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SII Tuscaloosa averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SII Tuscaloosa TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where SII Tuscaloosa falls in its industry

418 Sulfur and sulfur compounds, n establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Sulfur and sulfur compounds, n employers in Alabama.

SII Tuscaloosa (26 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SII Tuscaloosa
SII Tuscaloosa (26 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

SII Tuscaloosa has fewer employees than the Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specifi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · AL · Tuscaloosa

418 Sulfur and sulfur compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 151 employers in Tuscaloosa, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Niagara Refining LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evonik Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascensus Specialties, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thatcher Company Inc 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Robertsdale 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Breeder and Broiler Dept 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sand Mountain Hatchery 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phifer Kauloosa 1,419 FTE
CITY-NEAR BFG3 Tuscaloosa Facility 1,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR McAbee Construction Inc 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tuscaloosa Processing 526 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant RP 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainfield Distribution Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Ritz-Carlton Orlando, Grande Lakes 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CLS 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDonough Store #1711 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE FPR 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grapevine Mills Store #2101 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.