Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing · California

Sila Nanotechnology

Alameda, CA · ~279 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sila Nanotechnology runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sila Nanotechnology: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sila Nanotechnology safety composite

Sila Nanotechnology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2021→2022

Sila Nanotechnology injury rate improved

Sila Nanotechnology's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.2 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.2 · 2022=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335991 · Alameda, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO CCF - Piedmont
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCF - Piedmont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sila Nanotechnology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sila Nanotechnology averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sila Nanotechnology TCR series: 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Sila Nanotechnology falls in its industry

93 Fibers, carbon and graphite, m establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Fibers, carbon and graphite, m employers in California.

Sila Nanotechnology (279 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Sila Nanotechnology
Sila Nanotechnology (279 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sila Nanotechnology has more employees than the Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.9 0.6 3 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335991 · CA · Alameda

93 Fibers, carbon and graphite, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 79 employers in Alameda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCF - Piedmont 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCCFC Evanston 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Huntsville, Alabama 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hanwha Qcells America Irvine Office 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pavement Recycling Systems, Inc. 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT San Francisco (Fremont) 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay City Mechanical Inc. 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 626 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. 2,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. - Alameda Campus 2,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webcor Builders 1,688 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia (State Printing) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1756 TAMPA, FL 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PCI Tampa IPS 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Branham Corporation-Houston 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manheim Milwaukee 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Elmira 070 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0314 - Colchester Vt Whse 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0365 - Caguas Pr Whse 279 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.