Carbon specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing · South Carolina

CCF - Piedmont

Piedmont, SC · ~292 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCF - Piedmont runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Carbon specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CCF - Piedmont: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Carbon specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCF - Piedmont safety composite

CCF - Piedmont scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CCF - Piedmont held a steady TCR band

CCF - Piedmont's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2018 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.9 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335991 · Piedmont, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Sila Nanotechnology
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sila Nanotechnology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CCF - Piedmont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCF - Piedmont averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Carbon specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCF - Piedmont TCR series: 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where CCF - Piedmont falls in its industry

93 Carbon specialties for aerospa establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Carbon specialties for aerospa employers in South Carolina.

CCF - Piedmont (292 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate CCF - Piedmont
CCF - Piedmont (292 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

CCF - Piedmont has more employees than the Carbon specialties for aerospace use (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.3 4 0 0
2023 1.1 0.8 4 0 0
2022 1.6 0.9 5 0 1
2021 1.3 1.3 1 2 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 1.2 0.9 4 0 0
2018 0.9 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335991 · SC · Piedmont

93 Carbon specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sila Nanotechnology 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCCFC Evanston 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Huntsville, Alabama 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAC Carbon Products, Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CM Tucker Lumber of Pageland 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC150 Prosperity Plywood 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Motus Spartanburg Assembly, LLC 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Confluence Outdoor Inc. 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR Schad Boiler Setting Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-X081 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Baker Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitsubishi Electric US Inc-22 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matthias Villegas Jr Flc 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant PW 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland OH FXFE-CLE 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE EvergreenHealth Monroe (DBA Valley General Hospital) 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.