Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center

Winston-Salem, NC · ~103 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center: 3.0 TCR = 46% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.0 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #89/510
  • PHOTO Holdrege Memorial Ho…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holdrege Memorial Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center averages 3.0 TCR (46% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center (103 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center
Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center (103 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.3 7.1 1 6 0
2019 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2018 3.6 2.4 2 1 0
2016 4.9 4.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Winston-Salem

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holdrege Memorial Homes 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plum City Care Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sylmar Health and Rehabilitation Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Trace 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 103731 - Enviva Hamlet Plant 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Contracting 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Synergy Installation Solutions 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Forest City Erectors Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holdrege Memorial Homes 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MDG Masonry LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fashion Place #557 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sherwood Midwest LLC 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guest Supply LLC. (409 Kennedy Drive, Sayreville, NJ) 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aisin Chemical Indiana, LLC. 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behr Paint Company Kutztown Distribution 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.