Fire sprinkler system installation · Ohio

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary

Cincinnati, OH · ~319 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary safety composite

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary: 1.8 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2022

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.8 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #106/300
  • PHOTO Ahern Fond du Lac - …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~319 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=2.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 300 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Ohio.

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary (319 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary
Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary (319 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Silco Fire & Security - Corporate Summary has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.9 1.7 10 0 0
2021 0.9 0.6 3 0 0
2020 2.6 1.9 7 1 0
2019 1.8 1.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Cincinnati

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boyers 72 Degrees 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson & Blanc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hiller Denver 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CAK4 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORBIS Urbana 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dayton - SES 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Peoria 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bshsi St. Fran East 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fellowes, Inc Itasca 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0647 - Orland Park Il Whse 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0432 - Corona Ca Whse 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0129 - Santa Clara Ca Whse 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0782 - Turlock Ca Whse 319 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.