Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing · South Carolina

Silgan Containers Lancaster

Lancaster, SC · ~49 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Lancaster runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Silgan Containers Lancaster: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Lancaster safety composite

Silgan Containers Lancaster scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2023

Silgan Containers Lancaster injury rate improved

Silgan Containers Lancaster's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Lancaster, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Mo…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Modesto Yosemite (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Lancaster averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Lancaster TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Lancaster falls in its industry

217 Lids and ends, can, light gaug establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Lids and ends, can, light gaug employers in South Carolina.

Silgan Containers Lancaster (49 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Lancaster
Silgan Containers Lancaster (49 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Lancaster has fewer employees than the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · SC · Lancaster

217 Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 51 employers in Lancaster, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Modesto Yosemite 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Metalpack - Milwaukee, WI 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Packaging - Huron 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Can-One USA 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC Hatchery 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANGLEY ELECTRIC OPERATIONS 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broad River Electric Cooperative 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samet Corporation - Charleston SC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morningside of Lancaster 1,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster County Government 1,009 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax Laboratories Inc. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax SC1 375 FTE
NAT-TCR Silgan Containers Modesto Yosemite 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spirit 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR North Metro Harness Iniative LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Acument 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HP Hood- Vernon Transportation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville IMC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Aerial Construction LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avanti Foods Company 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.