Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Silgan Containers Maxton

Maxton, NC · ~252 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Maxton runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Silgan Containers Maxton: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Maxton safety composite

Silgan Containers Maxton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Silgan Containers Maxton injury rate improved

Silgan Containers Maxton's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Maxton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Tr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~252 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Trenton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Maxton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Maxton averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Maxton TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Maxton falls in its industry

217 Cans, light gauge metal, manuf establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Cans, light gauge metal, manuf employers in North Carolina.

Silgan Containers Maxton (252 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Maxton
Silgan Containers Maxton (252 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Maxton has more employees than the Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2020 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2018 1.8 1.3 4 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · NC · Maxton

217 Cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in Maxton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Trenton 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Auburndale 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canpack US LLC Olyphant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Decatur 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seiren North America, LLC 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc. 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCFI Polyurethanes 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mooresville FG 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Soup Supply Company, INC 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maxton 1,019 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Railroad Friction Products Corp. 188 FTE
NAT-TCR Vandergrift Operations 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brass Ass Casino 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR White Equipment Leasing Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Cleveland/Westlake/Crocker Park 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hubert North America Service, LLC 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Powell - 0725 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE GlobalRehab - Scottsdale, LLC (d/b/a HonorHealth Rehabilitation Hospital) 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Folger Coffee Co.- Chef 252 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.