Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, manufacturing · California

Silgan Containers Riverbank

Riverbank, CA · ~180 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Riverbank runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Silgan Containers Riverbank: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Riverbank safety composite

Silgan Containers Riverbank scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Silgan Containers Riverbank injury rate improved

Silgan Containers Riverbank's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.0 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Riverbank, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Ball Tinplate 030 Br…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ball Tinplate 030 Brookline N. Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Riverbank in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Riverbank averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Riverbank TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Riverbank falls in its industry

217 Can lids and ends, light gauge establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Can lids and ends, light gauge employers in California.

Silgan Containers Riverbank (180 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Riverbank
Silgan Containers Riverbank (180 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Riverbank has more employees than the Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 1 0
2021 1.9 0.5 4 0 0
2020 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2017 1.0 0.5 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · CA · Riverbank

217 Can lids and ends, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 19 employers in Riverbank, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ball Tinplate 030 Brookline N. Canton 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Sacramento 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Beverage-Fairfield 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Ft Madison 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BALOIAN PACKING CO., INC. 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJ FARM LABOR CONTRACTING, INC OFFICE 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2905-29050002-4148 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing East 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monschein Industries, Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2096 - Riverbank 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2096 - Modesto Riverbank 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Brien's Market 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardiology Partners P.I. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Enclos - Chester Shop 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Borg Indak, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Lyon Medical Center 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of New City 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Budsgunshop.Com, LLC 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Statesville Mold Plant 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.