Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing · Texas

Silgan Plastics Houston

Houston, TX · ~117 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Plastics Houston runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Silgan Plastics Houston: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Plastics Houston safety composite

Silgan Plastics Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2022→2023

Silgan Plastics Houston injury rate improved

Silgan Plastics Houston's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.8 in 2022 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.8 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #65/76
  • PHOTO kordsa chattanooga
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: kordsa chattanooga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Plastics Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Plastics Houston averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Plastics Houston TCR series: 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Plastics Houston falls in its industry

644 Resins, plastics (except custo establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 76 Resins, plastics (except custo employers in Texas.

Silgan Plastics Houston (117 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Plastics Houston
Silgan Plastics Houston (117 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Silgan Plastics Houston has more employees than the Resins, plastics (except custom compound median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2022 3.8 0.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · TX · Houston

644 Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR kordsa chattanooga 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allnex USA Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW Powertrain Components - Lake Geneva 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pensacola Facility 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Genesis Energy Offshore Pipeline 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grayson-Collin Electric Cooper 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morrow Renewables 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE PICCo -06300241 Dow Gulfstream CRW 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 6235 Hallandale 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Davin Electric, Inc. Main Office 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ACC Electronix, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kevin Richardson Grading LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accutemp 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE H2A Complete II, Inc.Anzualda Harvesting, Inc. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkdale America LLC Plant 21 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong Garden Centers 791 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.