Roofing contractors · Connecticut

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT

Manchester, CT · ~82 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT: 7.0 TCR = 249% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT safety composite

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT: 5.5 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT's TCR rose 1.8 from 5.5 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Manchester, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 249% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO Combined Roofing Ser…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Combined Roofing Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT averages 7.0 TCR (249% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 Roofing contractors employers in Connecticut.

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT (82 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT
Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT (82 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 6.1 6 0 0
2023 7.3 6.1 6 0 0
2022 7.4 3.7 6 0 0
2021 7.7 4.4 7 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2019 6.3 5.2 6 0 0
2018 9.8 8.4 7 0 0
2017 9.1 6.5 7 0 0
2016 5.5 3.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · CT · Manchester

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 145 employers in Manchester, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Combined Roofing Services LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACW Construction 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHELTER ROOFING & SOLAR CONSTRUCTION 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roof Services of NY 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GROWER DIRECT FARMS 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Windsor Service 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerospace Techniques Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wallingford, CT 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Memorial Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 235 MANCHESTER CT 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1891 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Trade Center 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chatsworth Products Company, New Bern, NC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Porter St 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun-Star Electric, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schutt Sports LLC - Salem 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adr Ny Dist LLC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlan Bakeries Colorado 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marysville Service Center 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.