Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Alaska

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska

Wasilla, AK · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska: 2.2 TCR = 74% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska safety composite

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2021→2023

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska injury rate improved

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.5 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Wasilla, AK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/27
  • PHOTO Christner Contractin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Christner Contracting Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silver Mountain Construction Alaska averages 2.2 TCR (74% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska TCR series: 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Silver Mountain Construction Alaska falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 27 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Alaska.

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silver Mountain Construction Alaska
Silver Mountain Construction Alaska (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Silver Mountain Construction Alaska has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AK · Wasilla

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 54 employers in Wasilla, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Christner Contracting Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kyana Commercial Interiors LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pyramid Construction 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Construction Corp 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aurora Energy Power Plant 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Energy, LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alaska Resource Group LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works / O&M 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2074 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2074 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00653 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Corrections (34) 287 FTE
NAT-TCR St Louis Brewery 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 310 Maple Avenue 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Miscellaneous Erectors 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (PHL-6345) 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SGS Retail - Crowley 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honolulu HI -GWK 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCSLC - Home Office 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verdeco Recycling 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.