Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · New Jersey

SilverLine - North Brunswick

North Brunswick, NJ · ~1,676 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SilverLine - North Brunswick runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

SilverLine - North Brunswick: 2.9 TCR = 87% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SilverLine - North Brunswick safety composite

SilverLine - North Brunswick scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SilverLine - North Brunswick: 2.3 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2017

SilverLine - North Brunswick's TCR rose 1.1 from 2.3 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · North Brunswick, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #25/44
  • PHOTO Orrex Plastics
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~1,676 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orrex Plastics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

SilverLine - North Brunswick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SilverLine - North Brunswick averages 2.9 TCR (87% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SilverLine - North Brunswick TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where SilverLine - North Brunswick falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 44 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in New Jersey.

SilverLine - North Brunswick (1,676 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SilverLine - North Brunswick
SilverLine - North Brunswick (1,676 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

SilverLine - North Brunswick has more employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 1.9 60 0 0
2016 2.3 1.5 39 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NJ · North Brunswick

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 65 employers in North Brunswick, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orrex Plastics 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamco Industries, Inc. West Unity Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bway Cidra 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Metal Products, Div of Plastic Products Co., Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Children's Specialized Hospital 1,675 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey 1,679 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryker- Mahwah 1,670 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Sort Center (Paulsboro) 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products LLC 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2003 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2003 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR USPL Nutritionals LLC 278 FTE
NAT-TCR 17- Kingsport 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DePaoli Mosaic Company 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shiloh Steel Dr 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Talan Products, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-TXAUS95 1,676 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - JAX7 1,676 FTE
NAT-SIZE ProScribe, LLC 1,675 FTE
NAT-SIZE FCI Milan 1,677 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.