Janitorial Services · Georgia

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP)

Lake Park, GA · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Janitorial Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP): 5.4 TCR = 207% of Janitorial Services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) safety composite

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2016→2017

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) injury rate improved

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP)'s TCR fell 10.8 from 10.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.8 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561320 · Lake Park, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/36
  • PHOTO Lavoro Services Corp
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lavoro Services Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) averages 5.4 TCR (207% of the Janitorial Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) falls in its industry

652 Janitorial Services establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 36 Janitorial Services employers in Georgia.

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) (33 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP)
Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) (33 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Sizemore Inc. - HD DC #5085 Lake Park #200-30 (VOP) has fewer employees than the Janitorial Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.8 10.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561320 · GA · Lake Park

652 Janitorial Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 20 employers in Lake Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lavoro Services Corp 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8027066-Mars - Topeka, KS 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Skilled Resources - Tampa/Fletcher 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ChildCare Careers 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cairo 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pullet/Breeder Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Gin & Peanut Co., Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRP Madison 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADA Harvesting, LLC 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trejo Labor Service, LLC 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5085 LAKE PARK RDC 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trejo Brothers Produce, LLC 310 FTE
NAT-TCR TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Scranton (Pascr) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mooresville Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage House 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HMA Contracting Corp. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson Home Health Care Services 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Plainfield 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Dayton 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.