Bridge construction · New Jersey

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590

Harrison, NJ · ~298 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590: 1.1 TCR = 38% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 safety composite

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590: 0.8 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.8 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Harrison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #7/73
  • PHOTO California Departmen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Department of Transportation Facility 198 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 averages 1.1 TCR (38% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 73 Bridge construction employers in New Jersey.

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 (298 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590
Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 (298 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 has more employees than the Bridge construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.2 7 0 0
2023 0.8 0.3 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NJ · Harrison

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 13 employers in Harrison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 198 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104910 - LA 1: Port Allen Canal BR REPL 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNIFE RIVER - TANGENT DIVISION 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curran Contracting Company 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE All American Poly NJ 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE DIY - NJ Headquarters 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evonik Corp Parsippany Site 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE NFI Management Services LLC-2 COOPER ST 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrison Sportservice, Inc. 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supor Blvd 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR C.S. Osborne & Co. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRISTATE BUNS LLC 74 FTE
NAT-TCR Holly Construction Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 047 - Holland 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 249 - Delaware OH 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palfinger US, Omaha Standard 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teichert Construction Stockton 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Station #82 & Fire Training Center 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy Industries 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlisle, PA 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.