Lubrication, Sales & Engineering · Virginia

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing

Hampton, VA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lubrication, Sales & Engineering workplace, earning a grade C.

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing: 2.4 TCR = 109% of Lubrication, Sales & Engineering BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing safety composite

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2020

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing injury rate improved

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Hampton, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO 201422
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 201422 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing averages 2.4 TCR (109% of the Lubrication, Sales & Engineering BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing falls in its industry

589 Lubrication, Sales & Engineeri establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Lubrication, Sales & Engineeri employers in Virginia.

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing (51 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing
SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing (51 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

SKF Lubrication Systems/Cooper Split Roller Bearing has more employees than the Lubrication, Sales & Engineering median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · VA · Hampton

589 Lubrication, Sales & Engineering employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 231 employers in Hampton, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 201422 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brenmar 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nashua 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXHO2 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Glade Spring Svc Ctr 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlottesville - Gas 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lionberger Construction 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE purcell construction inc. Virginia 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara CarePlex Hospital 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norfolk Tide Facility 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coleman Place 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newport News Transit Center 990 FTE
NAT-TCR CCGA1000 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maine Fire Protection Systems 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabot Marshall Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell NY09 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Velocity AGS 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office and Warehouse 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Texas Health Center at Tyler 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rio Grande Medical Center 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.