Managing residential real estate · New York

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR)

New York, NY · ~600 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) runs at 415% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Managing residential real estate workplace, earning a grade F.

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR): 5.8 TCR = 415% of Managing residential real estate BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) safety composite

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR): 1.4 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2023

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR)'s TCR rose 3.9 from 1.4 in 2020 to 5.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 415% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #46/62
  • PHOTO John E. Groninger Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~600 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John E. Groninger Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) averages 5.8 TCR (415% of the Managing residential real estate BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) TCR series: 2020=1.4 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 1.4

Where SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) falls in its industry

500 Managing residential real esta establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 62 Managing residential real esta employers in New York.

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) (600 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR)
SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) (600 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

SKI Realty Inc Corporation (SKR) has more employees than the Managing residential real estate median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 5.2 5 0 0
2022 9.9 8.9 10 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 4 3 0
2020 1.4 1.4 4 18 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · NY · New York

500 Managing residential real estate employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John E. Groninger Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elevate Property Management 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danbury Broadview Heights 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Samaritan Society-Eugene Abbey 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CooperVision West Henrietta Distribution & Packaging Center 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liverpool DC00055 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Roosevelt Hotel 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE LONG ISLAND CONCRETE INC 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Parke Warehouses 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC HealthCare Athens, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA Bowling Green (DBA Young's Mechanical) 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TTI, Inc- 3737 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phillips 66 Los Angeles 600 FTE
NAT-SIZE Probation 600 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aluminum Boats (Lund/Crestliner) New York Mills 600 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ken's Foods 600 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.