Meat products canning (except baby, pet food, poultry) made from purchased carcasses · Nebraska

Skylark Meats

Omaha, NE · ~350 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skylark Meats runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Meat products canning (except baby, pet food, poultry) made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade D.

Skylark Meats: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Meat products canning (except baby, pet food, poultry) made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skylark Meats safety composite

Skylark Meats scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Skylark Meats injury rate improved

Skylark Meats's TCR fell 3.7 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/29
  • PHOTO Catelli Brothers Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 146 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catelli Brothers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Skylark Meats in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skylark Meats averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Meat products canning (except baby, pet food, poultry) made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skylark Meats TCR series: 2016=4 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Skylark Meats falls in its industry

613 Meat products canning (except establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 29 Meat products canning (except employers in Nebraska.

Skylark Meats (350 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Skylark Meats
Skylark Meats (350 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Skylark Meats has more employees than the Meat products canning (except baby, pet median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.0 0 1 0
2023 2.6 2.6 8 0 0
2022 5.7 2.4 19 0 0
2021 3.3 1.2 14 0 0
2020 6.2 1.6 27 0 0
2019 5.8 4.4 25 0 0
2018 7.5 6.0 35 0 0
2016 4.0 3.1 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · NE · Omaha

613 Meat products canning (except baby, pet food, poultry) made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Catelli Brothers Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresh Mark Salem 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olympia Processing, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth Cooked 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc. Deshler Location 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE 776 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE ContiTech 352 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 776 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Matalco Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus, in 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineering Industries, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Adaptive Textiles 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ContiTech 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Irving 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freshway 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.