Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made from purchased carcasses · New Jersey

Catelli Brothers Inc.

Collingswood, NJ · ~247 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Catelli Brothers Inc. runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade D.

Catelli Brothers Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Catelli Brothers Inc. safety composite

Catelli Brothers Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Catelli Brothers Inc. injury rate improved

Catelli Brothers Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.3 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Collingswood, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Fresh Mark Salem
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~247 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fresh Mark Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Catelli Brothers Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Catelli Brothers Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Catelli Brothers Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.3 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Catelli Brothers Inc. falls in its industry

613 Veal, primal and sub-primal cu establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Veal, primal and sub-primal cu employers in New Jersey.

Catelli Brothers Inc. (247 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Catelli Brothers Inc.
Catelli Brothers Inc. (247 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Catelli Brothers Inc. has more employees than the Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 12 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 13 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 14 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 17 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 7 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · NJ · Collingswood

613 Veal, primal and sub-primal cuts, made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 7 employers in Collingswood, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fresh Mark Salem 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olympia Processing, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skylark Meats 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth Cooked 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ray Angelini Inc. 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Secaucus Facility 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Halo Pharmaceutical, Inc. d/b/a Cambrex Whippany 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2381 - Paramus 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Methodist Communities - Collingswood 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Collingswood Fire Department 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAWA SITE - 352 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1517 Collingswood SD 22 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 170 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IKEA #026 Canton 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bolger Brothers, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Springs at Clackamas Woods 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magic Springs Theme and Water Park 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE HACI Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reman Drivetrain Facility 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalamazoo SC 247 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.