Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living

St. Cloud, MN · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living runs at 670% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living: 25.5 TCR = 670% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living safety composite

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2023

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living injury rate improved

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living's TCR fell 1.1 from 31.5 in 2018 to 30.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 31.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=31.5 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=28.2 · 2023=30.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · St. Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.5 · 670% of ind

  • DART 24.9 DART
  • RANK #236/240
  • PHOTO Delaney at Parkway L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delaney at Parkway Lakes (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skylight Gardens Assisted Living averages 25.5 TCR (670% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=31.5 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=28.2 · 2023=30.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Skylight Gardens Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living (40 employees, TCR 25.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Skylight Gardens Assisted Living
Skylight Gardens Assisted Living (40 employees, TCR 25.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Skylight Gardens Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 30.4 24.9 2 9 0
2022 28.2 8.5 7 3 0
2021 11.8 11.8 1 3 0
2018 31.5 7.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · St. Cloud

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 130 employers in St. Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delaney at Parkway Lakes 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenwood Alzheimer's Special Care Center 25.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoney Brook of Copperas Cove 25.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pines of Newmarket 25.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDML TW Shop - SE 0010 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Eye Feedmill 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms HL 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeders 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital 4,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud Hospital 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud State University 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
NAT-TCR Sam Wexler Plumbing 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 230410-Bal-Gwynn Oak Br 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WAG HOTELS - West Sacramento 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pdx-Ground Ops 25.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE R T Milord Co 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Green 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villas Del Sol Assistant Living 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSR PIM Cooler DBA Central City Cooling 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.