Cold storage warehousing · Indiana

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C.

Greenfield, IN · ~216 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold storage warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C.: 2.1 TCR = 36% of Cold storage warehousing BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. safety composite

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. held a steady TCR band

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 2.6 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Greenfield, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #5/27
  • PHOTO Konoike-Pacific Cali…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~216 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the Cold storage warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. falls in its industry

1,039 Cold storage warehousing establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 27 Cold storage warehousing employers in Indiana.

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. (216 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smithfield, Greenfield D.C.
Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. (216 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. has more employees than the Cold storage warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2018 3.1 2.7 8 0 0
2017 4.1 2.9 10 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · IN · Greenfield

1,039 Cold storage warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 126 employers in Greenfield, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Link Logistics Auburndale 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USCS- Syracuse, UT 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Roads Produce Distributors Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Plaza 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Bros. Construction Co., Inc. 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 7390 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ligonier 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MQJ1 2,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Management Services, Inc 2,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield 1,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Headquarters 1,453 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwark Metal Idaho Division 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Auburn University Evs 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Msu Student Center Food Court 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Synthomer Jefferson Hills LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield East Mo - 3344 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omaha Ne - 3068 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waverly 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE SWD Inc. 216 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.