Cold storage warehousing · California

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc.

Wilmington, CA · ~139 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold storage warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 36% of Cold storage warehousing BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. safety composite

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. held a steady TCR band

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 3.2 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Wilmington, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #18/125
  • PHOTO Smithfield, Greenfie…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the Cold storage warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=3 · 2023=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 5.8

Where Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. falls in its industry

1,039 Cold storage warehousing establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 125 Cold storage warehousing employers in California.

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. (139 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Konoike-Pacific California,Inc.
Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. (139 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. has more employees than the Cold storage warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2020 2.2 1.7 4 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 4 0 0
2018 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2017 3.2 2.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · CA · Wilmington

1,039 Cold storage warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 58 employers in Wilmington, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smithfield, Greenfield D.C. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Link Logistics Auburndale 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USCS- Syracuse, UT 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Roads Produce Distributors Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PV Farming Operations, LLC 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE SVL - 01 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Labor Inc 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Antelope Valley S/C 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR TraPac, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips 66 Los Angeles 600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Wilmington 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valero Wilmington Refinery 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Marion Mold & Tool, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Express Tacoma 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GH Metal Solutions, Loc'n 345 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharon Healthcare Pines 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MAIN 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04022 - Detroit Central Hauling 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Bodegon Grocery Inc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Viking 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.