Building cleaning services, janitorial · Georgia

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.

Gainesville, GA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 25% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. safety composite

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Gainesville, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/149
  • PHOTO Medtronic Northridge
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medtronic Northridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (25% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 149 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Georgia.

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc.
Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · GA · Gainesville

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Northridge 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imperial Building Maintenance 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCC Neenah 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SBM-JLL Intel Hillsboro 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wade Plantation LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clover Leaf Gin Inc. Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Arlington Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton GA 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Kls Mondelez or 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Planes Moving & Storage, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Robinson Rancheria resort and casino 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000010 Mental Health Services 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 293 Armonk Limousine Car Service, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Electric Supply Center City Philadelphia 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americold Logistics, LLC: Brooklyn Park 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Cleveland 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.