Building cleaning services, janitorial · Rhode Island

Imperial Building Maintenance

Warwick, RI · ~78 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Imperial Building Maintenance runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Imperial Building Maintenance: 1.1 TCR = 25% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Imperial Building Maintenance safety composite

Imperial Building Maintenance scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Imperial Building Maintenance held a steady TCR band

Imperial Building Maintenance's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Warwick, RI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Medtronic Northridge
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medtronic Northridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Imperial Building Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Imperial Building Maintenance averages 1.1 TCR (25% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Imperial Building Maintenance TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Imperial Building Maintenance falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Rhode Island.

Imperial Building Maintenance (78 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Imperial Building Maintenance
Imperial Building Maintenance (78 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Imperial Building Maintenance has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · RI · Warwick

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 207 employers in Warwick, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Northridge 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith's Cleaning of South Hall, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCC Neenah 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SBM-JLL Intel Hillsboro 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Providence 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell RI06 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE 25320306 MIDDLETOWN, RI 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unifi Aviation Services : PVD - Providence 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Hospital 1,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIPRO - PROVIDENCE 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care New England Medical Group 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE (RIPRO) 1,244 FTE
NAT-TCR Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc 463K 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 300 Capitol Mall 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gunze Plastics & Engineering Corporation of America 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Conroe 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SilverCrest Properties LLC Parkshore 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE SilverCrest Properties LLC Summit Place 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamstra Heating & Cooling, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenbrier Health Care Center, LLC 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.