Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing · Maryland

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury

Salisbury, MD · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury safety composite

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury injury rate improved

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Salisbury, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO SC07
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SC07 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury falls in its industry

247 Communications equipment, mobi establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Communications equipment, mobi employers in Maryland.

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury (64 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury
Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury (64 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Smiths Interconnect - Salisbury has fewer employees than the Communications equipment, mobile and mic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · MD · Salisbury

247 Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SC07 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viasat Duluth 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Electronics 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aethercomm 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creekstone Landscape & Excavating, LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leonard Kraus 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1300 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE IronShore Contracting 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR H. Rocker Electric Co., Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RUSH Construction Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mary Culver Home 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston County Electric Cooperative 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crews Subaru of Charleston 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suddath Relocation Systems of Oregon, LLC (W) 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dependable Stamping Company 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inter-County Energy Cooperative 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.