Food Service Contractors · California

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons

Orange, CA · ~98 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons: 9.6 TCR = 318% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons safety composite

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2017→2021

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons's TCR fell 12.7 from 13.5 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.5 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=16.0 · 2021=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Orange, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 318% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #486/586
  • PHOTO Pioneer College Cate…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 020/Tabor College (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons averages 9.6 TCR (318% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons TCR series: 2017=13.5 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=16 · 2021=0.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #486 safest of 586 Food Service Contractors employers in California.

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons (98 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons
Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons (98 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chapman-Randall Dining Commons has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 16.0 4.0 8 0 0
2018 7.8 0.0 4 0 0
2017 13.5 3.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Orange

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 319 employers in Orange, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 020/Tabor College 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norfolk Academy 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MITAGS 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Football Club F&B 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal GVIC Ranches 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapala Berry Farms 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag-Wise Enterprises, Inc 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bains Orchards Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine Health 6,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC - CHildren's Hospital of Orange County 4,962 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange 3,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange V2 3,652 FTE
NAT-TCR Ridout - Rogers 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin States Harley-Davidson 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Michael's Medical Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Cedarbrook-Allentown 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at West Allis-West Milwaukee Sd 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-NJNJ 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Coast Shredding 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.