Food Service Contractors · Texas

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr

Houston, TX · ~256 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr: 2.1 TCR = 69% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr safety composite

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2023

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #164/570
  • PHOTO TOGA CLUB 1
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TOGA CLUB 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr averages 2.1 TCR (69% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 570 Food Service Contractors employers in Texas.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr (256 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr
Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr (256 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Baylor Med Ctr has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.9 0.2 4 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2019 4.6 1.2 8 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 7 0 0
2017 2.5 1.2 4 0 0
2016 1.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · TX · Houston

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TOGA CLUB 1 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELMHURST UNIVERSITY 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GOOGLE MP1 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UAH - UNIVERSITY CENTER 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE VAM USA Hardy 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Southwest 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health - El Paso Butterfield 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIELD SALES - CE/I DIVISION 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Louisville KY (1) 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Google Mp1 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Er Lewis Construction Co, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CPI 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Hospital District #4 King County (DBA Snoqualmie Valley Hospital) 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE VT1 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooper Standard 256 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.