Food Service Contractors · Arkansas

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs

Hot Springs, AR · ~86 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs: 2.5 TCR = 82% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs safety composite

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2021

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Hot Springs, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/80
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT LOURDES NO…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT LOURDES NOREEN MCKEEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs averages 2.5 TCR (82% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 80 Food Service Contractors employers in Arkansas.

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs
Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chi - St. Vincent Hot Springs has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2016 5.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AR · Hot Springs

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LOURDES NOREEN MCKEEN 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DI 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7621-PDLLC-DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Long Beach School District 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hill Electric, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fayetteville,AR Forty48 Solutions - 425 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arkansas New #2 Helena 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Granges Americas Newport Operations 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR California Electric Supply (PC7700) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4818-MDMD 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1920 ENGLEWOOD, CO 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR E4-Nanuet Showroom 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4818-CNRP 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Parts and Products, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-MN02 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE KP-Frazer CSC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.