Food Service Contractors · Arizona

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di

Chino Valley, AZ · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di: 2.5 TCR = 82% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di safety composite

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2017→2024

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Chino Valley, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/152
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT LOURDES NO…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT LOURDES NOREEN MCKEEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di averages 2.5 TCR (82% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 152 Food Service Contractors employers in Arizona.

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di (36 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di
Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di (36 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chino Valley Unified School Di has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 7.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · Chino Valley

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 13 employers in Chino Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LOURDES NOREEN MCKEEN 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7621-PDLLC-DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Long Beach School District 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT AH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DAVIDSON 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verde River Growers, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (AZ) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Todd Whittaker Drywall Inc 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-01747 FAC-01747-CHINO VALLEY-AZ 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01747 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0017 1747 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR R Blume Underground, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-TCR S02981 - WM Conroe 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S04082 - Stoneville Hauling 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenfield 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Auto Pride Car Wash, Inc-Mission Car Wash 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bloomberg Skillman Cafe 100 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1985 Janice Ave. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victoria Plating Co., Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.