Building Cleaning/Maintenance · New Jersey

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial

Piscataway, NJ · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial safety composite

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2021→2022

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial injury rate improved

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Piscataway, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/101
  • PHOTO General Services - B…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Services - Building Maintenance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial TCR series: 2021=4 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 101 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in New Jersey.

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial (26 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial
Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial (26 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Custodial has fewer employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · NJ · Piscataway

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 124 employers in Piscataway, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Services - Building Maintenance 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleen Trax Maintenance Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hebrew Rehabilitation Center 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Pipeline Integrity 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockborn Trucking & Excavation, Inc 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Marine Co.DE, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Technology Center, Colgate - Palmolive 1,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Global Technology Center 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Company 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferraro Foods 733 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Children'S Museum 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CANTEX INC. Mineral Wells Distribution Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodlands Village 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Scottsdale Mfg 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oasis Holstein Dairy 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Af-Dover Patterson Dfac 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Mid-Pacific - Scudder Hall 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca - Pearland Medical 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.