Food Service Contractors · Indiana

Sodexo at Grace College

Winona Lake, IN · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Grace College runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Grace College: 1.9 TCR = 64% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Grace College safety composite

Sodexo at Grace College scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Grace College held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Grace College's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Winona Lake, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/168
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT UMF SOUTH …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT UMF SOUTH DINING HALL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Grace College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Grace College averages 1.9 TCR (64% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Grace College TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Grace College falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 168 Food Service Contractors employers in Indiana.

Sodexo at Grace College (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Grace College
Sodexo at Grace College (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Grace College has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · IN · Winona Lake

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in Winona Lake, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UMF SOUTH DINING HALL 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SOUTHWEST SCHOOL CORP FOOD 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MARY WASHINGTON UNIV CATERING 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BSO TANGLEWOOD 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE AquaBounty Farms Indiana LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Remington Plant 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Francesville 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone REMC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grace Schools 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grace Schools and Seminary 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Industries Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Umf South Dining Hall 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Knightsbridge Plastics 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5th Avenue Building - BHC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S02969 - El Sobrante Landfill 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Shasta Regional Medical Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lake Health West Med Ctr 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE EPPA Vadnais Heights Urgency Room 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Egger Steel Company 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.