Continuing care retirement communities · Indiana

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc.

Winona Lake, IN · ~143 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc.: 7.9 TCR = 207% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. safety composite

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2023

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. injury rate improved

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 10.9 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Winona Lake, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 207% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #88/136
  • PHOTO Anns Choice
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anns Choice (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. averages 7.9 TCR (207% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2022=5 · 2023=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 136 Continuing care retirement com employers in Indiana.

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. (143 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc.
Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. (143 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Grace Village Health Care Facility, Inc. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.7 6.2 5 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 4 0 0
2016 10.9 7.8 15 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Winona Lake

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in Winona Lake, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anns Choice 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dominion Maryville, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFICA SHERMAN LLC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Deig Bros. Lumber & Construction Co., Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clabber Girl Corporation - Main 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Fort Wayne 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grace Schools 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grace Schools and Seminary 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Industries Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT GRACE COLLEGE 47 FTE
NAT-TCR Holbrook Manufacturing 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenbrier Yard 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North America : Venice 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Wheel Campers, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE JK Hackl Transportation Services, Inc 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0214 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saputo Cheese Big Stone 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill Plain Electric 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.