Facilities Support Services · North Carolina

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital

Greensboro, NC · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital safety composite

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/18
  • PHOTO Pima County Superior…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 18 Facilities Support Services employers in North Carolina.

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital (38 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital
Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital (38 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Htm-Moses Cone Hospital has fewer employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · NC · Greensboro

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1101 Home Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - Chicago IL 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - New York 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Cheektowaga-Maryvale School 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Ariel Construction 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Usmc-E Mh 740 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE SHADOWLAWN 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.