Facilities Support Services · New York

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline

New York, NY · ~13 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline safety composite

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/36
  • PHOTO Pima County Superior…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~13 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 36 Facilities Support Services employers in New York.

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline (13 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline
Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline (13 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Markle Memorial Evangeline has fewer employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · NY · New York

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pima County Superior Court - Pretrial Services Downtown 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1101 Home Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - Chicago IL 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLL Corporate Office - New York 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fowler Bros,. Inc 13 FTE
STATE-SIZE JC Steel Erectors - District 3 DSNY Garage - 559 Park Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11205 13 FTE
STATE-SIZE 138 East 50th Street 13 FTE
STATE-SIZE CWPNY, Inc dba College Works Painting 13 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR RenCen - Tower 500 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 88 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 203 0.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.