Food Service Contractors · West Virginia

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil

Huntington, WV · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil: 1.0 TCR = 34% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil safety composite

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Huntington, WV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/32
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT CHAMPLAIN …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil averages 1.0 TCR (34% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil TCR series: 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 32 Food Service Contractors employers in West Virginia.

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil (30 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil
Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil (30 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · WV · Huntington

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 130 employers in Huntington, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LOYOLA UNIVERSITY STARBUCKS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT PARADISE COVE 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT FEDERAL RESERVE MIAMI CAFE 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE RW Products LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riedel Wilks Building Structures, Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neighborgall Construction Main 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE FT003 - Fiber Tech - Ona 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Medical Center 3,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc 2,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabell Huntington Hospital 1 2,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabell Huntington Hospital Employees 2,823 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Loyola University Starbucks 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 90-Topeka Rental 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobs - Prescott Valley - OMI 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Mustard St 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at George Mason Management 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nj Eastern Star Home 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hhc Bellevue Hospital Center 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Systems of Raleigh 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.