Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing · North Carolina

Stone Systems of Raleigh

Raleigh, NC · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stone Systems of Raleigh runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stone Systems of Raleigh: 2.7 TCR = 83% of Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stone Systems of Raleigh safety composite

Stone Systems of Raleigh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stone Systems of Raleigh: 0.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.98× in 2024

Stone Systems of Raleigh's TCR rose 5.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327991 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO K&D Countertops Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K&D Countertops Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Stone Systems of Raleigh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stone Systems of Raleigh averages 2.7 TCR (83% of the Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stone Systems of Raleigh TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Stone Systems of Raleigh falls in its industry

313 Cut Stone and Stone Product Ma establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Cut Stone and Stone Product Ma employers in North Carolina.

Stone Systems of Raleigh (30 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Stone Systems of Raleigh
Stone Systems of Raleigh (30 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Stone Systems of Raleigh has fewer employees than the Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.4 1 1 0
2023 10.2 7.6 4 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327991 · NC · Raleigh

313 Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K&D Countertops Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Top Master 2844 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinnacle Stone Products 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Solid Surfaces, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Bluegrass Hazelwood Admin 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nexus Steel LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Medeco Security Locks, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Roysons Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stone Systems of South Florida 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nammo MAC, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Odessa-Ector Generating Station 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Marshall University Chick Fil 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.