Building Cleaning and Maintenance · South Carolina

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc

Charleston, SC · ~145 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building Cleaning and Maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc: 0.7 TCR = 15% of Building Cleaning and Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc safety composite

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2023

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc injury rate improved

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/72
  • PHOTO Rhino Building Servi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rhino Building Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Medical University of Sc averages 0.7 TCR (15% of the Building Cleaning and Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Medical University of Sc falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning and Mainten establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 72 Building Cleaning and Mainten employers in South Carolina.

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc (145 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Medical University of Sc
Sodexo at Medical University of Sc (145 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Medical University of Sc has more employees than the Building Cleaning and Maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · SC · Charleston

4,064 Building Cleaning and Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rhino Building Services, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CAMPBELL SOUP - JANITORIAL 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polo Towers 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beebe Public Sch Main Campus 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cayce Company Inc. Florence, SC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bid Group Technologies 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1751 LOWE S OF CAMDEN SC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1751 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Honeywell Phoenix 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 125 Business park Dr. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Titus - Humboldt 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North Sacramento MLS 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE NAPCO Precast LLC (Broken Arrow) 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cox Avenue 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth Care Center Celebration 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Greater Northeast : SVC-Pine Brook NJ-USA 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.