Food Service Contractors · District of Columbia

Sodexo at National Geographic Society

Washington, DC · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at National Geographic Society runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at National Geographic Society: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at National Geographic Society safety composite

Sodexo at National Geographic Society scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at National Geographic Society: 0.0 → 50.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 50.5 TCR · DART/TCR 88.58× in 2024

Sodexo at National Geographic Society's TCR rose 50.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 50.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 88.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 50.5 DART
  • RANK #10/87
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT CHURCH FAR…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT CHURCH FARM SCHOOL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at National Geographic Society in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at National Geographic Society averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at National Geographic Society TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=50.5 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at National Geographic Society falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 87 Food Service Contractors employers in District of Columbia.

Sodexo at National Geographic Society (25 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at National Geographic Society
Sodexo at National Geographic Society (25 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at National Geographic Society has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 50.5 50.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · DC · Washington

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHURCH FARM SCHOOL 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Xavier U Stdnt Din 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UTAUSTIN TRAINING TABLE 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDC, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.REMOTE 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1915-1703X 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cost Plus World Market CHEVY CHASE 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Pompano Beach Drymix 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S&K Pump & Plumbing, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Steve Hoegger & Associates, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Powertrain Operations: Pilgrim Road 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Markle Residence 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bensenville School District 2 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkersburg, Wv Branch 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston, Wv Branch 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.