Food Service Contractors · Arkansas

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a

Arkadelphia, AR · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a: 2.4 TCR = 81% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a safety composite

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2018→2022

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a injury rate improved

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Arkadelphia, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/80
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT PERKIOMEN …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT PERKIOMEN SCHOOL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a averages 2.4 TCR (81% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 80 Food Service Contractors employers in Arkansas.

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a
Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist-Chick Fil a has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AR · Arkadelphia

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 30 employers in Arkadelphia, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT PERKIOMEN SCHOOL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CARITAS GOOD SAMARITAN MED CTR 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colby College Dana Hall 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BAPTIST PALMETTO PARK FOOD 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hilburn Builders, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJR Field 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Hickman BLY02-14 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Feedmill 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 318 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 318 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Danfoss, LLC 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hostess Brands LLC- Arkadelphia 173 FTE
NAT-TCR White Oaks 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Logistics -Monroe Logistics Way 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Motor Express Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Veyance Technologies Inc- Elkview, WV 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Hilton Head Hospital Evs 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Faribault School Dist-Cafteria 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Pickwick Center 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Montgomery Regional Hospit 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.