Food Service Contractors · Pennsylvania

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca

Easton, PA · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca: 1.0 TCR = 34% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca safety composite

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2022→2023

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca injury rate improved

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Easton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/463
  • PHOTO Bon Secours Anderson…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bon Secours Anderson Hospital - FNS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca averages 1.0 TCR (34% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 463 Food Service Contractors employers in Pennsylvania.

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca
Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Promedica Old Orchard Healthca has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · PA · Easton

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Anderson Hospital - FNS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenbrook South High School 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CENTENNIAL HILLS MED CTR -FOOD 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4021-110403600 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needhams Mushroom Farm 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSS Sales 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tech Mushroom Compost, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hopewell Organics, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Kotaco (Fargo) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ORION 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Texas North Louisianna : SVC-Lubbock TX-USA 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Rushville, IN-USA 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Young Harris College Facilitie 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Westmont College 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Brothers 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Max Gray Construction, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.